<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET News: Google files patent for wave-powered floating data center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cloudfeed.net/2008/09/08/cnet-news-google-files-patent-for-wave-powered-floating-data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cloudfeed.net/2008/09/08/cnet-news-google-files-patent-for-wave-powered-floating-data-center/</link>
	<description>Cloud Computing, Infrastructure-as-a-service, Platform-as-a-Service, Software-as-a-Service</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: code reduction</title>
		<link>http://cloudfeed.net/2008/09/08/cnet-news-google-files-patent-for-wave-powered-floating-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>code reduction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloudfeed.net/?p=163#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for taking your time to create this very useful infos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for taking your time to create this very useful infos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://cloudfeed.net/2008/09/08/cnet-news-google-files-patent-for-wave-powered-floating-data-center/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloudfeed.net/?p=163#comment-664</guid>
		<description>I just checked out the article. Google has come up with some interesting ideas in the past, but over-the-water servers seems almost over-the-top. I found this article on cloud computing that made me think that cloud computing is more of a business need than this idea from Google: http://www.itstrategists.com/Cloud-Computing.aspx.

It doesn't seem like cloud computing will be so easily replaced with Google's idea to make servers that are portable since the cloud is available now and seems more up-time reliable (storms at sea?). This new technology from Google sounds like it is more applicable to military needs rather than business needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked out the article. Google has come up with some interesting ideas in the past, but over-the-water servers seems almost over-the-top. I found this article on cloud computing that made me think that cloud computing is more of a business need than this idea from Google: <a href="http://www.itstrategists.com/Cloud-Computing.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.itstrategists.com/Cloud-Computing.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem like cloud computing will be so easily replaced with Google&#8217;s idea to make servers that are portable since the cloud is available now and seems more up-time reliable (storms at sea?). This new technology from Google sounds like it is more applicable to military needs rather than business needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
